Before I start this blog, this is all a theory, I do not want to offend anyone or determine anything. I just want people to open their minds and realise that not everything we are told is true.
“The morning of September 11, 2001, started off like any other. The Twin Towers stood tall in the Financial District, as they had for more than 30 years.
At 8:46 a.m, American Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center.
At 9:03 a.m, United Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower, leaving no doubt that this was an attack or was it something much more deeper than that?”…
All our lives we have grown up to watch cartoons, and films and in some films have been hidden messages. In 2001, a cartoon called Johnny bravo was just a normal children’s cartoon until many people noticed a poster behind the two characters saying “coming soon” and in the poster was the twin towers blowing up. There is many more cartoons and films predicting the 9/11 attack but I won’t go to much into detail, I just found the Johnny bravo one a little more creepy.
The movies and the cartoons are all called something as ‘predictive programming’. Basically this means that it is a recurring element across many conspiracy theories. The claim is that when conspirators plan a false flag operation, they hide references to it in the popular media before the atrocity takes place and then when the event occurs, the public has softened up, and therefore passively accepts it rather than offering resistance or opposition.
Whoever is in charge of world has an idea of what they want to happen in the future, so they programme these hidden messages into our minds when we are children as this is the easiest way to get into our heads because our brains are just starting to develop and this is when our brain is the most multiple. They do this so when we are older and the hidden messages become real, we begin to accept it because somehow we knew this was going to happen anyways.
I want to start the first claim with the tower attacks were the result of a controlled detonation.Bombs went off before the planes even hit the towers. In the videos theorists believe there is an explosion before the planes hit and lobbies were visibly damaged. The National Institute of Standards and Technology investigated the incident and decided that once the planes had hit the towers the plane debris “sliced through the utility shafts at the North Tower’s core creating a conduit of burning jet fuel” was quoted by popular mechanics.Explaining the collapse and the lobbies because the heat from the jet fuel explosion was concentrated and went off destroying anything in its path. From this theory comes another, and this theory claims that jet fuel could not have caused the structure to fail and collapse because jet fuel fires would never be hot enough to melt the steel supports. Jet fuel can burn anywhere between 800 degrees and 1500 degrees Farenheit, which is not hot enough to burn steel. Fortunately steel frames do not have to melt to collapse, they simply need to be weakened and the weight of the building and gravity will do the rest. (popular mechanics) However theorists have combated this with saying if it was just weakened the floors would have sagged or tilted.
Going along with the theory of controlled demolition detonation, claims have surfaced because visible clouds of dust come out the sides of the buildings that are interpreted as looking similar to implosions. The way the dust clouds appear and how the go in succession led to theorists claiming there had to be explosives within the towers. This is debunked with the engineering term of ‘pancaking’. As each floor collapsed above the floor below would not be able to absorb the blow, plus transmitting the force onto an level below. While the floors were collapsing, air would be released and the debris would fly out along with it.Most importantly,’pancaking’ does not need an explosion to initiate.
Lastly, the belief that the World Trade Center was a controlled demolition. Theorists believe the World Trade Center came down in a controlled demolition after Larry Silverstein decided the best thing to do would be to detonate seven hours after the towers were hit. Theorists believe a plane never hit mainly because debris was never recovered and the where the plane would supposedly hit would be too small to fit a Boeing 757. Going against this claim investigators found damage on the building and believe intense fire along with this damage caused the eventual collapse. “WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors—along with the building’s unusual construction—were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.”
I just wanted to throw some reasons why I personally think it was an inside job and that their is a lot of evidence that it could have been.
Thank you for reading, I hope for everyone to leave comments debating wether or not they think this was an inside job and be kind, I do not wish to offend anyone!